GEO Readiness

GEOAuditChecklist

Measure your website's technical readiness for the age of AI Search.

Readiness Score

Based on weighted technical factors including bot access, semantic structure, and data schema.

0%

1. Technical Access & Bot Governance

Ensures AI crawlers can physically access and read your content without being blocked.

Robots.txt allows GPTBot
Critical
Robots.txt allows ClaudeBot
Critical
Robots.txt allows Google-Extended
Critical
Server-Side Rendering (SSR) for Core Text
Critical
Mobile-Friendly Viewport
Priority
Sitemap.xml is clean (200 OK only)
Priority
Clean URL Structure
Priority
Fast Time-To-First-Byte (TTFB)
Priority

2. LLM Standards & Manifests

New protocols specifically designed to help Large Language Models navigate your site.

llms.txt present in Root
Critical
llms.txt links to Markdown content
Priority
No "Click to Expand" content
Priority
Content updated recently (Date displayed)
Priority

3. Semantic Structure & HTML5

How your code helps the AI understand what is a heading, what is data, and what is junk.

Semantic <article> tags used
Priority
Proper H1-H6 Hierarchy
Priority
Headings contain context
Priority
Tables used for Data (<table>)
Priority
Lists used for Steps (<ul>/<ol>)
Priority
Descriptive Alt Text
Priority
No internal ads breaking text flow
Priority

4. Entity Knowledge Graph (Schema)

Structured data that explicitly tells the AI 'Who, What, Where' without ambiguity.

Organization Schema (JSON-LD)
Critical
SameAs properties populated
Priority
FAQ Schema (if applicable)
Priority
Product/Service Schema
Priority
Breadcrumb Schema
Priority

5. Trust, Authority & E-E-A-T

Factors that reduce the 'Hallucination Risk' score of your content.

Author Bio Pages
Priority
External Citations (Outlinks)
Priority
About Us page exists
Priority
Contact/Physical Address visible
Priority
Privacy Policy & ToS
Priority
HTTPS / SSL Security
Priority

6. Content Optimization (GEO)

Writing styles that increase the likelihood of being cited as the source.

Inverted Pyramid Writing
Priority
Unique Statistics/Data
Critical
Quotes from Experts
Priority
Definition of Terms
Priority

Methodology

How AEO scoring actually works

The weighting is not arbitrary. It mirrors what AI engines do at retrieval time.

01 · Critical items (3 points)

Block citation entirely if missing

JavaScript-only rendering, missing canonical claims, and content that fails GIST Granularity will get a site excluded from AI citations regardless of how strong everything else is. These items are the gating layer.

02 · Standard items (2 points)

Reduce citation probability significantly

Missing schema, undated articles, no author bios, weak internal linking. Each one is recoverable, but their accumulation is what separates strong sites from invisible ones in AI search results.

03 · Minor items (1 point)

Marginal but compounding

BreadcrumbList schema, link text quality, alt text completeness. None of these alone moves the needle, but a site that handles all three signals editorial care to AI engines.

04 · Score thresholds

What each tier means

Under 40%: structural problems blocking citation. 40-60%: technical baseline solid, content quality the limiting factor. 60-80%: above most AI search competitors. Over 80%: positioned for consistent citation across major AI engines.

Glossary

Terms used in this audit

Plain-text definitions for the acronyms and concepts referenced throughout.

AEO
Answer Engine Optimization. Optimizing content for direct-answer AI engines like ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Claude. AEO rewards atomic, citable claims with clear attribution. Where SEO asks "does the page rank?", AEO asks "does this passage get pulled into the answer?"
GEO
Generative Engine Optimization. Optimizing for AI-powered search experiences like Google AI Overviews and SGE. GEO rewards structured, factual passages that AI engines can extract and cite alongside their generated summaries.
GIST
Granularity, Inferability, Specificity, Topicality. The four content properties that determine whether AI engines will cite a passage. Granular claims (atomic, single-sentence units), inferable without prior context, specific in their assertions (named tools, numbers, versions), and topically aligned with their headings.
llms.txt
A proposed AI-discovery file. Lives at the root of a domain (yoursite.com/llms.txt) and tells AI assistants what the site is, what content matters most, and how to navigate it. Proposed by Jeremy Howard in September 2024. By mid-2026, adoption sits around 10% of domains; SEO citation impact is low, but IDE agents and MCP servers route on it routinely.
E-E-A-T
Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, Trustworthiness. Google's quality framework, now mirrored by every major AI engine. Author identity, source attribution, original research, and editorial signals all feed into whether AI engines treat a site as cite-worthy.
AI Overviews
Google's AI-generated answer summaries. Appear above traditional search results for many queries. Sources cited in AI Overviews receive a share of impressions and clicks. Inclusion correlates with structured content, schema markup, and high topical authority.
JSON-LD
JavaScript Object Notation for Linked Data. The structured-data format Google explicitly prefers for schema markup. Lives in a single <script type="application/ld+json"> block in the page head. AI engines parse JSON-LD more reliably than Microdata or RDFa.

FAQ

Questions worth answering

What is the difference between SEO, GEO, and AEO?+

SEO (Search Engine Optimization) optimizes for traditional ranked search results. GEO (Generative Engine Optimization) optimizes for AI-powered search experiences like Google AI Overviews and SGE. AEO (Answer Engine Optimization) optimizes for direct-answer engines like ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Claude. The three overlap but require different content properties: SEO rewards depth and links, GEO rewards structured factual passages, AEO rewards atomic citable claims.

How long does a full audit take?+

About 45 minutes for an experienced SEO going through all 40 items on a single page. Less for a quick spot-check, more for a full site audit across multiple pages. The checklist is designed to be tackled section by section. Your progress saves automatically in your browser, so you can come back to it.

Is this checklist enough to fix everything?+

The checklist identifies what needs fixing. Fixing requires either manual content rewrites or an automated tool. For an automated audit that runs the same checks against any URL and ranks the gaps by impact, use the site audit at /get-started. For asset generation (schema markup, FAQ blocks, meta tags), use the free GEO Asset Generator.

Does my score predict actual AI citation rates?+

Indirectly. The 40 items in this checklist correlate with citation probability, but they do not guarantee citations. AI citation is influenced by query, model, retrieval freshness, and competitive landscape. A high score makes citation possible; a low score makes it unlikely.

How are points weighted?+

Items are worth 1, 2, or 3 points based on impact. Granularity, Specificity, and JS-only rendering are 3-point items because they're the most common failure modes. BreadcrumbList schema is 1 point because it helps but isn't critical. The total max score is 89 points across all 40 items. Your displayed score is the percentage of total points achieved.

Should I run this on every page or just the homepage?+

Both. Some items (llms.txt, robots.txt, Organization schema) are site-wide. Others (BlogPosting schema, paragraph length, factual density) are per-page. Run it once for site-wide items, then pick your top 5 highest-traffic pages and run the per-page items on each.

Report generated via WebsiteAIScore.com